Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside
From: paul c <toledobythesea_at_oohay.ac>
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 03:01:16 GMT
Message-ID: <00Wxg.242306$iF6.98822_at_pd7tw2no>
>
>
> What??? IIRC, the anti-trust division lost the case against IBM. At the
> time, I was working for DEC, number two to IBM's number one. Even Ken
> Olsen, the head of DEC, cautioned against finding IBM guilty.
>
>
>
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 03:01:16 GMT
Message-ID: <00Wxg.242306$iF6.98822_at_pd7tw2no>
David Cressey wrote:
> "Josip Almasi" <joe_at_vrspace.org> wrote in message
> news:ea7s0o$k86$1_at_ss408.t-com.hr...
>
>> BTW these days IBM had monopoly and had abused it, as was proven later.
>
>
> What??? IIRC, the anti-trust division lost the case against IBM. At the
> time, I was working for DEC, number two to IBM's number one. Even Ken
> Olsen, the head of DEC, cautioned against finding IBM guilty.
>
>
>
at the time, indirectly at least, i owed my (suspect) livelyhood to IBM. i knew it was true then, no matter what any court decided.
p Received on Thu Jul 27 2006 - 05:01:16 CEST