Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
From: Paul Mansour <paul_at_carlislegroup.com>
Date: 20 Jul 2006 07:37:58 -0700
Message-ID: <1153406278.016058.188140_at_h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>
Date: 20 Jul 2006 07:37:58 -0700
Message-ID: <1153406278.016058.188140_at_h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>
Bob Badour wrote:
> If the designer/user requests an auto-increment attribute and specifies
> a name for it, providing one doesn't confuse anything. If the
> designer/user never requested the attribute, exposing the physical
> structure anyway would confuse a lot.
Agreed. Received on Thu Jul 20 2006 - 16:37:58 CEST