Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside

From: Cimode <cimode_at_hotmail.com>
Date: 4 Jul 2006 05:11:17 -0700
Message-ID: <1152015077.452052.257010_at_j8g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>

Dmitry Shuklin wrote:
> Hi Cimode
>
> > What exactly is the purpose of your revolutionnary technology?
>
> and second - i want to make DB as general purpose DB.
Implementing an elementary storage retrieval mechanism for targetted purpose is one thing and does not allow to claim it makes a logical model for data management. Implementing a general purpose DBMS creates a need to answer several logical questions about operations, data integrity, correctenedd etc...Check other posts for what kind of operations and characteristics your technology needs to support to be sound...Good luck ;)

> WBR,
> Dmitry
Received on Tue Jul 04 2006 - 14:11:17 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: David Cressey: "Re: RM's Canonical database (was: Bob's 'Self-aggrandizing ignorant' Count)"
Previous message: Cimode: "Re: sql-99 array type"
In reply to Dmitry Shuklin: "Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside"
Next in thread: Dmitry Shuklin: "Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside"
Reply: Dmitry Shuklin: "Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside"
Reply: Cimode: "Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message