Re: sql-99 array type
From: David Cressey <dcressey_at_verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 02 Jul 2006 17:09:04 GMT
Message-ID: <Q4Tpg.422$b9.90_at_trndny01>
Date: Sun, 02 Jul 2006 17:09:04 GMT
Message-ID: <Q4Tpg.422$b9.90_at_trndny01>
"Darnel Castnblast" <salmonella_at_microbugs.net> wrote in message
news:vK-dnWcVxqZwpD7ZnZ2dnUVZ_sSdnZ2d_at_bresnan.com...
> Are there any databases that have implemented the
> array type, found in the sql-099 spec?
>
> Doesn't this (array types in sql) mean
> relational tables could model many-to-one relations
> in a more tree-like manner, where the attachee table
> holds pointers to the attacher tables of a
> many-to-one relationship?
>
> If so, this would make automated GUI form
> generation (matching a schema) almost trivial.
By "trivial" do you mean "easy" or "unimportant"? Received on Sun Jul 02 2006 - 19:09:04 CEST