Re: RM's Canonical database
From: Andrew McDonagh <news_at_andmc.com>
Date: Sun, 02 Jul 2006 10:21:30 +0100
Message-ID: <e88370$j54$1_at_news.freedom2surf.net>
> that.
>
> FB
>
Date: Sun, 02 Jul 2006 10:21:30 +0100
Message-ID: <e88370$j54$1_at_news.freedom2surf.net>
Frans Bouma wrote:
> Bob Badour wrote:
>
>> Ron Jeffries wrote: >> >>> On Sat, 01 Jul 2006 11:27:17 +0200, mAsterdam >>> <mAsterdam_at_vrijdag.org> wrote: >>> >>>> Robert Martin wrote: >>>> >>>>> ... business rules don't belong in the database. >>>> What, in your opinion, does belong in the database? >>> Uh ... data? >> 'Data' is information represented suitably for machine processing. In >> what way are business rules not information or not represented >> suitably for machine processing?> data and information? No don't bother looking up a Dijkstra quote on
>
> Bob, are you now suggesting that you don't know the difference between
> that.
>
> FB
>
:)
I feel a 'self-aggrandizing idnorant' quote coming from Bob any second now.... Received on Sun Jul 02 2006 - 11:21:30 CEST