Re: RM's Canonical database

From: Frans Bouma <perseus.usenet.NOSPAM._at_xs4all.nl>
Date: 02 Jul 2006 09:15:43 GMT
Message-ID: <xn0eo8u0m5ehc1000_at_news.xs4all.nl>


Bob Badour wrote:

> Ron Jeffries wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 01 Jul 2006 11:27:17 +0200, mAsterdam
> > <mAsterdam_at_vrijdag.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Robert Martin wrote:
> > >
> > > > ... business rules don't belong in the database.
> > >
> > > What, in your opinion, does belong in the database?
> >
> > Uh ... data?
>
> 'Data' is information represented suitably for machine processing. In
> what way are business rules not information or not represented
> suitably for machine processing?

        Bob, are you now suggesting that you don't know the difference between data and information? No don't bother looking up a Dijkstra quote on that.

                FB

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lead developer of LLBLGen Pro, the productive O/R mapper for .NET
LLBLGen Pro website: http://www.llblgen.com
My .NET blog: http://weblogs.asp.net/fbouma
Microsoft MVP (C#) 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Sun Jul 02 2006 - 11:15:43 CEST

Original text of this message