Re: The wisdom of the object mentors (Was: Searching OO Associations with RDBMS Persistence Models)
Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2006 22:27:06 -0400
Message-Id: <65qhl3-q2o.ln1_at_pluto.downsfam.net>
erk wrote:
>> Snipped yet more insult laden waffle. >> >> Bob, >> >> Can you not simply argue your point without resorting to insults? >> [...] >> However, just because its different does not mean its wrong.
>
> Nor does it mean it's right; that's why the non-insulting portion of
> the text is more important. While I don't agree with Bob's approach to
> these conversations, I find the substance of his arguments compelling.
> Maybe I just lack civility, but whatever your conclusions, Bob's use of
> "idiot", "predator", "stupidity", etc. are backed up, usually in the
> same paragraph, by examples.
>
Maybe you're right.
So I can't agree or disagree with Bob because he doesn't consort with self-aggrandizing ignorami like me.
But if you want to know what I *really* think about something, download my code, look at it, watch it run, step through it, and you'll see through all my b*llsh*t to what I'm really about. I wonder if Bob would ever show us his. Is coding beneath him?
One more thing. It is fashionable to accuse religious people of close-minded beligerent intolerance. I am both religious and scientifically educated, and the most viciously beligerent and close-minded people I've ever met were all in science or programming. Not that I haven't met a few in Church, but when it comes to bile, they can't hold a candle to those who worship at the altar of Most Perfect Rational Human Mind.
-- Kenneth Downs Secure Data Software, Inc. (Ken)nneth_at_(Sec)ure(Dat)a(.com)Received on Wed Jun 07 2006 - 04:27:06 CEST