Re: The wisdom of the object mentors (Was: Searching OO Associations with RDBMS Persistence Models)

From: CMCC <c_jackal_at_hotmail.com>
Date: 30 May 2006 07:52:47 -0700
Message-ID: <1149000767.069213.187420_at_y43g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>


Ed Kirwan wrote:
> CMCC wrote:
> The OO application
> > is a detail to be decided at the last possible moment and kept in a
> > position so flexible that it can be swapped out for another at a whim.
> >
>
> I consider myself, at present, an OOer (though a poor one), but I'd be
> deeply proud if I could write an application that was flexible enough to
> be swapped out for another at a whim (with no service degradation
> noticeable by customers, I presume you mean).
>
> That would be a superb OO application indeed.
>

No. That would mean you have a 'superb' database indeed; and a system where subsystems *know* their responsibilities. Read the reply of David Cressey.

Regards,
Carlos Received on Tue May 30 2006 - 16:52:47 CEST

Original text of this message