Re: Relation name = address?

From: Tony D <tonyisyourpal_at_netscape.net>
Date: 19 May 2006 08:02:08 -0700
Message-ID: <1148050928.760032.166960_at_j55g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>

No, logically it's 0, 1 and infinity. The large and arbitrary power of 2 is an implementation constraint, not a limitation on the maths behind the semantics. Received on Fri May 19 2006 - 17:02:08 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Anne & Lynn Wheeler: "Re: Impossible Database Design?"
Previous message: Bob Badour: "Re: Process Model"
In reply to: Bob Badour: "Re: Relation name = address?"
Next in thread: Erwin: "Re: wise words"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message