Re: circular relationships ok?
From: David Cressey <dcressey_at_verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 04 Mar 2006 13:27:50 GMT
Message-ID: <qBgOf.236$eJ1.2_at_trndny05>
Date: Sat, 04 Mar 2006 13:27:50 GMT
Message-ID: <qBgOf.236$eJ1.2_at_trndny05>
"Gene Wirchenko" <genew_at_ucantrade.com.NOTHERE> wrote in message
news:61gh02d8g5jvvbfueksckqnmkgf8lnueeo_at_4ax.com...
> On 3 Mar 2006 12:50:31 -0800, "Marshall Spight"
> <marshall.spight_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >Gene Wirchenko wrote:
> >> On 2 Mar 2006 18:51:01 -0800, "Marshall Spight"
> >> <marshall.spight_at_gmail.com> wrote:
If the persons table has information on both married and
> unmarried persons and there is a table about marriages, where do you
> think the brithdates should go?
>
> To me, putting it in the marriages table is ludicrous. An
> unmarried person has a birthdate.
>
What modifications does the data model need for use in Massachusetts? Received on Sat Mar 04 2006 - 14:27:50 CET