Re: Data Redundancy

From: x <x_at_not-exists.org>
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 16:08:38 +0200
Message-ID: <dtcihb$a87$1_at_nntp.aioe.org>


"Leif B. Kristensen" <junkmail2_at_solumslekt.org> wrote in message news:DMqdnU5UzM0H0Gve4p2dnA_at_telenor.com...

> Hey Mr. Celko. I've developed a genealogy database that relies very much
> on text.

What you mean by "relies on text" ?

>I'd like to have those query possibilities at hand that you
> mention, but in lack of anything better, I still think that the RM
> covers my problem space quite well.

The RM or SQL ?

>It's kludgy, no two words about that.

What is kludgy ? The RM or the solution ?

>But it works, and to my amazement, it actually is working
> exceedingly well.

In what way exceeded your expectations ?

> I'd be happy to share some revelations about the data model if anyone
> cares to ask.

Please, share with us your revelations.
I would be happy to read about them.
Other peoples say "go buy my book about it" or "come to my seminary". Received on Mon Feb 20 2006 - 15:08:38 CET

Original text of this message