Re: OT - Best way to handle dbdebunk
From: Bob Badour <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 13:19:45 GMT
Message-ID: <RTFIf.30279$VV4.311454_at_ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>
>
> Bob,
>
> Please remember that this is a theory newsgroup. As such, expressing
> personal opinions of people's character, such as your above observation
> of how smart Vadim is, is actually offtopic. I say this even though
> I completely agree with you about his intelligence. (Actually there
> may also be a couple of other threads in which you have commented
> on people's characters.)
>
> In short, I want to encourage you to discuss the ideas, not the people.
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 13:19:45 GMT
Message-ID: <RTFIf.30279$VV4.311454_at_ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>
>>Vadim Tropashko wrote: >> >>Keep in mind too, your mind finds things transparent that more modest >>minds find totally incomprehensible.
>
> Bob,
>
> Please remember that this is a theory newsgroup. As such, expressing
> personal opinions of people's character, such as your above observation
> of how smart Vadim is, is actually offtopic. I say this even though
> I completely agree with you about his intelligence. (Actually there
> may also be a couple of other threads in which you have commented
> on people's characters.)
>
> In short, I want to encourage you to discuss the ideas, not the people.
Hi Marshall,
Your suggestion would have more merit if the group actually discussed any real theory. When I returned here, I saw self-promoting ignorants engaged in public acts of mental masturbation (as always), and one or two people trying to make the best of a bad situation.
When well over 90% of the content of the group is nonsense posted by self-promoting ignorants who are unable to respond to substantive critique, it seems disingenuous to suggest one may not point that out. Given the extremely low signal to noise ratio, it seems doubly disingenuous to suggest one may not point others toward the signal. Received on Wed Feb 15 2006 - 14:19:45 CET