Re: Multi Valued Interface Models?
From: mAsterdam <mAsterdam_at_vrijdag.org>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 21:22:45 +0100
Message-ID: <43f0ea2e$0$11073$e4fe514c_at_news.xs4all.nl>
>>x wrote:
>>>modeling method.
>>Which is a common misconception due to sloppy wording.
>
> Then why there are class diagrams in it ?
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 21:22:45 +0100
Message-ID: <43f0ea2e$0$11073$e4fe514c_at_news.xs4all.nl>
x wrote:
> mAsterdam wrote:
>>x wrote:
>>>>http://microgold.com/Stage/UML_FAQ.html say it is an object oriented
>>>I don't know UML but I was exposed to some OMT after I've learned about
>>>formal languages, automata theory and RM. For this reason it was easy to
>>>grasp.
>>>
>>>modeling method.
>
>>Which is a common misconception due to sloppy wording.
>
> Then why there are class diagrams in it ?
Because the class structure is one of the nice-to-have's when you have a piece of software you are working on? Maybe I don't understand the question. Received on Mon Feb 13 2006 - 21:22:45 CET