Re: Knowledge and Ignorance over Time
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 13:05:11 GMT
Message-ID: <bMUnf.20556$ea6.16188_at_news-server.bigpond.net.au>
"David Cressey" <dcressey_at_verizon.net> wrote in message
news:HXPnf.2507$pF.1490_at_trndny08...
>
> "mountain man" <hobbit_at_southern_seaweed.com.op> wrote in message
> news:qWKnf.20093$ea6.2082_at_news-server.bigpond.net.au...
>
>> Humans have three inner capacities: instinct, intellect and intuition
>> whereas
>> the environment of database theory really is only modelling the
>> intellect,
>> which
>> is essentially machine-like in its operation.
>
> Could that be because we are running our databases on machines?
The intellect uses the "machinery" of logic and set theory, and is thus (in theory) machine-like in the evaluation of what the intellect perceives as "logical truth".
I recently read a book in which the author makes the following assertion:
"The individual human mind is like
a remote connection to a database.
The database is human consciousness itself,
of which our own cognizance is merely an individual expression,
but with its roots in the common consciousness
of all mankind"
- Power vs. Force, The Hidden Determinants of Human Behaviour, Dr. David Hawkins, 1995. [p.34] http://www.mountainman.com.au/map_of_consciousness.htm
I found this an interesting claim from a database perspective, and wonder to what degree such a database may be seen as "relational" or otherwise.
-- Pete Brown IT Managers & Engineers Falls Creek Australia www.mountainman.com.au/softwareReceived on Wed Dec 14 2005 - 14:05:11 CET
