Re: Normalisation review

From: Jenski <jenski182_at_aol.com>
Date: 20 Oct 2005 09:35:56 -0700
Message-ID: <1129826156.359885.43960_at_z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>

lol, you got me...

The actual question is "Using an example from the third normal form tables developed above, show that normalisation is a process of non loss decomposition."

I just want to understand the question.... Received on Thu Oct 20 2005 - 18:35:56 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Jenski: "Re: help with EER diagram"
Previous message: Andy Dingley: "Re: What's this join technique called ?"
In reply to: zeldorblat_at_gmail.com: "Re: Normalisation review"
Next in thread: -CELKO-: "Re: Normalisation review"
Reply: -CELKO-: "Re: Normalisation review"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message