Re: Advice on SQL and records
From: Eric Junkermann <eric_at_deptj.demon.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 16:41:42 +0100
Message-ID: <Dde9kqT2IfCDFwXL_at_deptj.demon.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 16:41:42 +0100
Message-ID: <Dde9kqT2IfCDFwXL_at_deptj.demon.co.uk>
In message <4309d82b$0$97095$ed2619ec_at_ptn-nntp-reader03.plus.net>, Paul
<paul_at_test.com> writes
>
>
>You could argue that "record" is a better term because "row" has
>implications of physical rather than logical structure.
>
And why does "row" have implications of physical rather than logical structure?
-- Eric JunkermannReceived on Mon Aug 22 2005 - 17:41:42 CEST