Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
From: Jonathan Leffler <jleffler_at_earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 20:30:05 GMT
Message-ID: <h3_ue.8743$hK3.8480_at_newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net>
>>On the other hand, I know from personal experience
>>that even some of the big names that are right at the core of the hype,
>>are very clear about what they think XML is useful for what it is not
>>useful for, and who would judge any claims that it would somehow replace
>>the relational model as, and I quote, ridiculous.
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 20:30:05 GMT
Message-ID: <h3_ue.8743$hK3.8480_at_newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net>
Jon Heggland wrote:
> jan.hidders_at_REMOVETHIS.pandora.be says...
>>On the other hand, I know from personal experience
>>that even some of the big names that are right at the core of the hype,
>>are very clear about what they think XML is useful for what it is not
>>useful for, and who would judge any claims that it would somehow replace
>>the relational model as, and I quote, ridiculous.
> > > Which big names are those?
Amongst others, Don Chamberlain.
-- Jonathan Leffler #include <disclaimer.h> Email: jleffler_at_earthlink.net, jleffler_at_us.ibm.com Guardian of DBD::Informix v2005.01 -- http://dbi.perl.org/Received on Fri Jun 24 2005 - 22:30:05 CEST