Re: MultiValue Databases

Neo wrote:
> Again, thanks for posting RM script to allow a comparison. As
> indicated, one needs to use a different RM schema to support the
> additional data/queries requested after the initial db/schema was
> completed. Also, in some circumstances, one might need to either move
> the original data to new db or update existing db rather then recreate
> the entire db from scratch. Notice that xrdb did not require such
> changes to accommodate additional data/query in this particular case.

You have demonstrated no such thing.

adding new data to any database requires moving it to a new state. That applies to your network DB as well as RM databases. So even your DB might have to be moved to other storage if the allocated storage ran out.

Day after day you make the same wrong headed arguements. You serve a useful purpose in this group by demonstrating what design choices and database models to avoid. Received on Thu Jun 09 2005 - 16:13:39 CEST