Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]

From: Ged Byrne <ged.byrne_at_gmail.com>
Date: 8 Jun 2005 06:00:23 -0700
Message-ID: <1118235623.402079.30690_at_g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>

Alex,

This all makes sense, but this is not how NULLs work in SQL databases.

NULL behaves the way that you describe UNKNOWN.

The scheme you describe could be implemented using the special values approah. Received on Wed Jun 08 2005 - 15:00:23 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Alexandr Savinov: "Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]"
Previous message: Alexandr Savinov: "Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate & Darwin? [M.Gittens]"
In reply to: Alexandr Savinov: "Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]"
Next in thread: Alexandr Savinov: "Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]"
Reply: Alexandr Savinov: "Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message