Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]

From: Jan Hidders <jan.hidders_at_REMOVETHIS.pandora.be>
Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2005 20:35:14 GMT
Message-ID: <6ynpe.113539$eo6.6698056_at_phobos.telenet-ops.be>

mAsterdam wrote:
>
> I am less confident. BTW this reminds me of people saying it wouldn't be
> that tough to come up with a usable, relatively simple 'list' algebra.

That's funny. That reminds me of people saying that such algebras are already available in the literature. :-)

Jan Hidders

Received on Tue Jun 07 2005 - 22:35:14 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Neo: "Re: MultiValue Databases"
Previous message: Jan Hidders: "Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]"
In reply to mAsterdam: "Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]"
Next in thread: Marshall Spight: "Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]"
Reply: Marshall Spight: "Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message