Re: Some Hype on "new" databases - where's the theory in this group?
From: hyeebah jones <hj_at_haitchjay.net>
Date: Sun, 08 May 2005 07:17:32 GMT
Message-ID: <427dbd0b_at_news.comindico.com.au>
Date: Sun, 08 May 2005 07:17:32 GMT
Message-ID: <427dbd0b_at_news.comindico.com.au>
"paul c" <toledobythesea_at_oohay.ac> wrote:
> a few years ago, i asked a couple of old friends to interpret pages 54 to
> 56 of Darwen and Date's TTM. all three of us had differing results for
> simple examples. (the other two guys have enough degrees to counter my
> lack of one.) i've never seen any discussion of such basics in this
> 'theory' group. how come? isn't this the kind of thing that should be
> discussed here?
>>>>The authors used a lot of words to say very little of any value. In >>>>fact most of the article didn't seem to really say anything. Received on Sun May 08 2005 - 09:17:32 CEST