Re: Tools for automated normalization ?
From: mAsterdam <mAsterdam_at_vrijdag.org>
Date: Tue, 03 May 2005 00:11:45 +0200
Message-ID: <4276a59b$0$150$e4fe514c_at_news.xs4all.nl>
>
> Hi Scot,
> well currently I do not have time to learn a concept that is totally
> new for me, and figure out what your "ORM" really is all about, but
> since you are saying it is not a normalization per se, I guess this is
> not quite what I now was looking for.
>
> Scot, do you agree with be that the abbreviation "ORM" usually mean
> "Object-Relational-Mapping" ??
> If so, then why have you chosen to cause confusion by marketing your
> concept "Object-Role Modeling" with the same abbreviation ??
Date: Tue, 03 May 2005 00:11:45 +0200
Message-ID: <4276a59b$0$150$e4fe514c_at_news.xs4all.nl>
tomjbr.10216233_at_bloglines.com wrote:
>>This isn't a normalization tool per se, but you might be >>interested all the same.... >>Object-Role Modeling (ORM) models...
>
> Hi Scot,
> well currently I do not have time to learn a concept that is totally
> new for me, and figure out what your "ORM" really is all about, but
> since you are saying it is not a normalization per se, I guess this is
> not quite what I now was looking for.
>
> Scot, do you agree with be that the abbreviation "ORM" usually mean
> "Object-Relational-Mapping" ??
> If so, then why have you chosen to cause confusion by marketing your
> concept "Object-Role Modeling" with the same abbreviation ??
Sorry for butting in :-) I guess it depends on ones background. If somebody would use the acronym ORM out of the blue, I would start with the assumption Object-Role Modeling is meant. Received on Tue May 03 2005 - 00:11:45 CEST