Re: the relational model of data objects *and* program objects

Neo wrote:
> >> [model] used by XDb
> >
> > I think it's just not any more useful than the others that we have.
>
> Would you be willing to model/query the example in
comp.database.object
> thread titled "Modelling Property Listing (with XDb2)" and see if it
is
> or isn't any more useful in that one particular case? (If so, please
> start by showing how to represent the equivalent in a
> systematic/non-redundant manner using any other model)

No? I've been following your examples for some time, and have yet to see any value... and no, "try it" isn't an adequate motivation. For every challenge I've seen, I've seen adequate responses. It's just tiring at this point. Received on Wed Apr 13 2005 - 15:03:34 CEST