Re: Foreign key in Oracle Sql
From: DA Morgan <damorgan_at_x.washington.edu>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 09:51:01 -0800
Message-ID: <1106675308.98304_at_yasure>
>
>
> Hi DA,
>
> And that was exactly what I was saying. Next decade will be the decade of
> Linux, if it continues to grow as it grows now. This decade is still a
> Microsoft decade, as MS still has more market share than all competitors
> together.
>
> Best, Hugo
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 09:51:01 -0800
Message-ID: <1106675308.98304_at_yasure>
Hugo Kornelis wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 07:47:44 -0800, DA Morgan wrote:
>
>
>>Hugo Kornelis wrote: >> >> >>>>>* http://news.com.com/2100-1001-236732.html?legacy=cnet >>>>>This page has a more serious appearance. It lists Linux market share for >>>>>server OS at 16% in 1998 and 25% in 1999. I'm not sure how to relate these >>>>>numbers to the numbers I quoted from other sources in my previous message >>>>>(projected 28% of worldwide server shipments and redeployments by 2008; >>>>>16% of enterprises expecting over half of the company servers to run Linux >>>>>in 2005). >>>> >>>>To me this seems high. There is still a lot of Solaris, AIX, and HP/UX >>>>out there not to mention Windows: Especially on Exchange and other non- >>>>database servers. >>> >>> >>>Thanks for proving my point. :-) >> >>Did not such thing. The numbers are the numbers. And they clearly >>indicate a larger and larger percentage of the data center being >>run on Linux. Certainly not a majority ... but the number is >>increasing and by the end of this decade, the point I was making, >>it should approach critical mass unless stopped by the last resort >>of scoundrels ... a law suit by Microsoft.
>
>
> Hi DA,
>
> And that was exactly what I was saying. Next decade will be the decade of
> Linux, if it continues to grow as it grows now. This decade is still a
> Microsoft decade, as MS still has more market share than all competitors
> together.
>
> Best, Hugo
We are in complete agreement except to me the decade of accendency for Linux is to what I was referring and for you the decade when it has reached that point. Nothing here but using the same words to mean different things.
Regards,
-- Daniel A. Morgan University of Washington damorgan_at_x.washington.edu (replace 'x' with 'u' to respond)Received on Tue Jan 25 2005 - 18:51:01 CET