Re: Logical equivalence of simple and complex types under the relational model?
From: Alfredo Novoa <alfredo_at_ncs.es>
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2004 00:34:42 +0100
Message-ID: <19fcr01clu4sonv686ve9q0g1q97fpc8ie_at_4ax.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2004 00:34:42 +0100
Message-ID: <19fcr01clu4sonv686ve9q0g1q97fpc8ie_at_4ax.com>
On Thu, 02 Dec 2004 16:00:03 GMT, "Dan" <guntermann_at_verizon.com> wrote:
>case. If you want to rely on a short, misleading definition from
>dictionary.com, then that is your perogative.
I have checked several sources and all of them say the same.
> I've already addressed the
>definition issue to you directly at length in another thread.
I don't remember it.
> Having a
>deeper understanding of the term and its use in computer science would help
>the quality of discussion.
I don't want to discuss something so clear.
http://www.nightflight.com/foldoc-bin/foldoc.cgi?orthogonal+instruction+set
Regards Received on Wed Dec 08 2004 - 00:34:42 CET