Re: 1GB Tables as Classes, or Tables as Types, and all that refuted

>>Alfredo Novoa wrote:
>>>Then I can continue to think the same without worry :)
>>
>>Sure. If you are not worried by incorrect arguments....

I already did that in this thread and you chose to ignore it.

>>Yes, and as anybody who has actually done some research on OODBMSs knows 
>>that is blatant nonsense.

Just repeating a claim is not very interesting. Actually supplying some evidence for it would really help the discussion.

> It is clear that Date's arguments are dangerous for the OODBMS retro
> "researchers", and they don't seem to have any decent
> counter-argument, so they try to discredit Date's works with general
> and ad-hominem disqualifications.

Again, some evidence would be nice.

Received on Fri Dec 03 2004 - 20:34:06 CET

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]