Re: Floyd's algorithm in SQL

From: --CELKO-- <jcelko212_at_earthlink.net>
Date: 2 Dec 2004 18:14:25 -0800
Message-ID: <18c7b3c2.0412021814.7c13d40_at_posting.google.com>

>> The following was tested with DB2 so it might not be fully
compliant with Standard SQL. For example, I believe the Standard requires a recursive WITH to be defined as WITH RECURSIVE. <<

I'll have to look that up, but DB2 has good SQL compliance. This looks good. Thanks! Received on Fri Dec 03 2004 - 03:14:25 CET

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Dawn M. Wolthuis: "Re: Logical equivalence of simple and complex types under the relational model?"
Previous message: --CELKO--: "Re: Floyd's algorithm in SQL"
Maybe in reply to: --CELKO--: "Floyd's algorithm in SQL"
In reply to John Gilson: "Re: Floyd's algorithm in SQL"
Next in thread: Dawn M. Wolthuis: "Re: Logical equivalence of simple and complex types under the relational model?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message