Re: Logical equivalence of simple and complex types under the relational model?

From: Jonathan Leffler <jleffler_at_earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2004 05:35:01 GMT
Message-ID: <9Qxrd.5839$u81.1917_at_newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net>

Alfredo Novoa wrote:
> SQL "domains" are a joke.

A very sick joke if that's what it is (they are). :-(

-- 
Jonathan Leffler                   #include <disclaimer.h>
Email: jleffler_at_earthlink.net, jleffler_at_us.ibm.com
Guardian of DBD::Informix v2003.04 -- http://dbi.perl.org/

Received on Thu Dec 02 2004 - 06:35:01 CET

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: mikharakiri_nospaum_at_yahoo.com: "Re: U_SUMMARIZE: how aggregate is calculated?"
Previous message: Jonathan Leffler: "Re: U_SUMMARIZE: how aggregate is calculated?"
In reply to Alfredo Novoa: "Re: Logical equivalence of simple and complex types under the relational model?"
Next in thread: Alfredo Novoa: "Re: Logical equivalence of simple and complex types under the relational model?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message