Re: 1GB Tables as Classes, or Tables as Types, and all that refuted

From: Ja Lar <ingen_at_mail.her>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 22:53:40 +0100
Message-ID: <41a502f0$0$282$edfadb0f_at_dread11.news.tele.dk>

"Alfredo Novoa" <anovoa_at_ncs.es> ...

> A relation is not a set of values ...
You can have it that way. Meanwhile, I'll move on to more meaningful issues ... Received on Wed Nov 24 2004 - 22:53:40 CET

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Kenneth Downs: "Re: Normalize until neat, Automate until Complete"
Previous message: Ja Lar: "Re: 1GB Tables as Classes, or Tables as Types, and all that refuted"
Maybe in reply to: Costin Cozianu: "1GB Tables as Classes, or Tables as Types, and all that refuted"
In reply to Alfredo Novoa: "Re: 1GB Tables as Classes, or Tables as Types, and all that refuted"
Next in thread: Rene de Visser: "Re: 1GB Tables as Classes, or Tables as Types, and all that refuted"
Reply: Alfredo Novoa: "Re: 1GB Tables as Classes, or Tables as Types, and all that refuted"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message