Re: 1GB Tables as Classes, or Tables as Types, and all that refuted
From: Alfredo Novoa <alfredo_at_ncs.es>
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 10:45:34 GMT
Message-ID: <41a3148c.3692859_at_news.wanadoo.es>
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 10:45:34 GMT
Message-ID: <41a3148c.3692859_at_news.wanadoo.es>
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 15:33:16 +0100, "Ja Lar" <jalar_at_nomail.com> wrote:
>"Why is it a great blunder to equate class with relvar"
Indeed, the first statement is not clear for many people but
type=variable is an evident blunder for anybody who knows what type
and variable are.
>Try again: _Why_ is it a great blunder to "mix types with values"? The
>"Because it is a great blunder to mix type with value or variable". And
>"type = class"
>answer "that's obvious" is of no (logical) value - that's the hole point in
>the paper this thread discusses.
If you don't know what types, variables and values are, that is your problem.
Regards Received on Tue Nov 23 2004 - 11:45:34 CET