Re: Argument for 1NF by counter-example
From: Tony Douglas <tonyisyourpal_at_netscape.net>
Date: 4 Nov 2004 15:26:48 -0800
Message-ID: <bcb8c360.0411041526.7a983185_at_posting.google.com>
Date: 4 Nov 2004 15:26:48 -0800
Message-ID: <bcb8c360.0411041526.7a983185_at_posting.google.com>
"Laconic2" <laconic2_at_comcast.net> wrote in message news:<ebqdnV5zZ-WYThncRVn-oQ_at_comcast.com>...
> "Gene Wirchenko" <genew_at_mail.ocis.net> wrote in message
> news:10k8o0p3al3godgeurcbjmeo474l8ba3u9_at_4ax.com...
>
> > I would like to see more agreement on something so basic to OOP
> > as objects.
>
> Yep.
>
> I would also like to see more agreement among users of the RDM on something
> so basic as what a relation is.
Touché ! Received on Fri Nov 05 2004 - 00:26:48 CET