Re: Andrew Tanenbaum AP story
From: Dan <guntermann_at_verizon.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2004 07:26:46 GMT
Message-ID: <WK%hd.11251$vB.7207_at_trnddc03>
Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2004 07:26:46 GMT
Message-ID: <WK%hd.11251$vB.7207_at_trnddc03>
"Marshall Spight" <mspight_at_dnai.com> wrote in message
news:FzShd.561164$8_6.144052_at_attbi_s04...
> "Dan" <guntermann_at_verizon.com> wrote in message
> news:jcvhd.9820$vJ.253_at_trnddc02...
>>
>> Obviously Linux wasn't obsolete...
>
> Why do you say that? Because it's popular? Is it necessarily the case
> that anything popular can't be obsolete?
Geez Marshall. Take a pill or something. If you wouldn't have snipped second part of the sentence...
"Obviously Linux wasn't obsolete, but Tanenbaum wasn't wrong in some of his criticisms."
- Dan