Re: By The Dawn's Normal Light

From: Dawn M. Wolthuis <dwolt_at_tincat-group.comREMOVE>
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 15:39:36 -0500
Message-ID: <clu9qr$u8p$1_at_news.netins.net>


"Laconic2" <laconic2_at_comcast.net> wrote in message news:zbqdna_fVJQZwx_cRVn-1A_at_comcast.com...
>
> "Dawn M. Wolthuis" <dwolt_at_tincat-group.comREMOVE> wrote in message
> news:cltem0$alq$1_at_news.netins.net...
>
> > Where ordered lists are not implemented, users place ordering attributes
> > into the data. The predicates stay the same whether a user adds in an
> > ordering attribute or the dbms software handles the ordering attribute
> > (along with inserts & deletes to an ordered list). There is no change
to
> > predicates in this case. --dawn
>
> What's the difference between a list and an SQL cursor?

A List is a logical type and not an implementation feature. I haven't worked enough with SQL cursors to know if they function the same as if using an indexed list, but I suspect they do in some cases. However, if you decide you need an ordered list in SQL and you add an attribute to handle the ordering, then a SQL cursor will not help with renumbering your list if you need to in order to accomodate an insertion, for example. Again, I haven't worked with SQL cursors enough to answer adequately, I uspect. --dawn Received on Fri Oct 29 2004 - 22:39:36 CEST

Original text of this message