Re: 4 the FAQ: Are Commercial DBMS Truly Relational?

From: mAsterdam <mAsterdam_at_vrijdag.org>
Date: Sat, 09 Oct 2004 14:22:16 +0200
Message-ID: <4167d7f7$0$37789$e4fe514c_at_news.xs4all.nl>

Craig Alexander Morrison wrote:

> NO!
>
> SQL NO!
>
> End of debate. (vbg)
>
> Check out www.dbdebunk.com

Relevant? Definitely. In the FAQ I would welcome a more elaborate statement/discussion of this position - or a more specific link. Links, anyone?

OT: Could you (in your next posts) please only quote the stuff relevant to your reply? This newsgroup is rather easy to read because people tend to do that.

http://www.allmyfaqs.com/faq.pl?How_to_post Received on Sat Oct 09 2004 - 14:22:16 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Paul: "Re: Hierarchical queries and indexes"
Previous message: Bernard Peek: "Re: XML: The good, the bad, and the ugly"
In reply to Craig Alexander Morrison: "Re: 4 the FAQ: Are Commercial DBMS Truly Relational?"
Next in thread: Lemming: "Re: Dawn doesn't like 1NF"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message