Re: Timeless Classics of Software Engineering
From: Gene Wirchenko <genew_at_mail.ocis.net>
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 20:01:08 -0700
Message-ID: <hp9jg0luh8baeq3aa7c9sk1eorhr8r29c9_at_4ax.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 20:01:08 -0700
Message-ID: <hp9jg0luh8baeq3aa7c9sk1eorhr8r29c9_at_4ax.com>
"Mikito Harakiri" <mikharakiri_at_iahu.com> wrote:
[snip]
>Right. That was a knee-jerk reaction to UML book somebody nominated.
>Database people would easily trade a stack of UML books to a decent database
>text.
Not true at all. I am keeping my UML text as an example of how horrible a textbook can be. It was not all bad though, just the part dealing with UML. The C++ portion was OK. Two authors, two areas, one suspicion on my part.
>P.S. Thank's god nobody mentioned "Learning XML in 21 minutes" by Bill
>Quickbuck yet.
And it only *seems* like 21 days?
Sincerely,
Gene Wirchenko
Computerese Irregular Verb Conjugation:
I have preferences.
You have biases.
He/She has prejudices.
Received on Fri Jul 30 2004 - 05:01:08 CEST
