Re: Date's updatable view rules
Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 11:44:16 GMT
Message-ID: <pan.2004.07.25.11.45.09.482127_at_REMOVETHIS.pandora.be>
On Sat, 24 Jul 2004 20:56:16 +0000, Marshall Spight wrote:
> "Jan Hidders" <jan.hidders_at_REMOVETHIS.pandora.be> wrote in message
> news:pan.2004.07.24.17.28.30.274191_at_REMOVETHIS.pandora.be...
>> On Sat, 24 Jul 2004 15:20:49 +0000, Marshall Spight wrote:
>>
>> > What do people here think about Date's updatable view rules?
>> >
>> > http://www.dbdebunk.com/page/page/1270150.htm
>>
>> Too ad hoc. Can IMHO be safely ignored if you are interested in real
>> database theory. A more serious approach would be along the lines of:
>>
>> http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=319634&dl=ACM&coll=portal
>>
>> http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=50068&dl=ACM&coll=portal
>>
>> http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=777946&dl=ACM&coll=portal
>
> Alas, acm citations cost $$$. My world is more google/citeseer/netnews
> than acm.org. If any of the authors of those papers have them on
> personal webpages, that's great.
Jens Lechtenboerger does:
http://dbms.uni-muenster.de/publications/downloads/tods-28-2.pdf
The others don't seem to be on-line for free.
- Jan Hidders