Re: A Normalization Question
From: Neo <neo55592_at_hotmail.com>
Date: 17 Jul 2004 20:24:13 -0700
Message-ID: <4b45d3ad.0407171924.678f012c_at_posting.google.com>
Date: 17 Jul 2004 20:24:13 -0700
Message-ID: <4b45d3ad.0407171924.678f012c_at_posting.google.com>
> > I think you will agree that 'brown is sequentially composed of
> > b, r, o, w, n ' is a fact or true proposition.
>
> Yes.
:)
> The reason 'brown' is a fact is because it is equivalent
> > to 'brown is sequentially composed of b, r, o, w, n '.
>
> No, it isn't.
How can we prove or disprove that
'brown' is equivalent to 'brown is squentially composed of b, r, o, w, n'.
Received on Sun Jul 18 2004 - 05:24:13 CEST