Re: A Normalization Question
From: Chris Hoess <choess_at_stwing.upenn.edu>
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2004 21:43:44 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <slrnceu4cg.h62.choess_at_force.stwing.upenn.edu>
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2004 21:43:44 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <slrnceu4cg.h62.choess_at_force.stwing.upenn.edu>
In article <4b45d3ad.0407071008.51298d73_at_posting.google.com>, Neo wrote:
>
> If graphical things were being stored in a db, and the db stored the
> same two graphical things twice, the second one would be a candidate
> for normalization.
So why is it that when I pointed out that strings are stored as bits in a
database, you insisted they could be normalized no further than the level
of characters, based on "symbolic logic"?
--
Chris Hoess
Received on Fri Jul 09 2004 - 23:43:44 CEST