Re: A Normalization Question
From: Neo <neo55592_at_hotmail.com>
Date: 6 Jul 2004 10:58:44 -0700
Message-ID: <4b45d3ad.0407060958.4c44fabe_at_posting.google.com>
Date: 6 Jul 2004 10:58:44 -0700
Message-ID: <4b45d3ad.0407060958.4c44fabe_at_posting.google.com>
> > But *facts* are *things* ! :-)
>
> Yes, but not all things are facts. :-)
This is why normalization of facts is a limited form compared to normalization of things. Received on Tue Jul 06 2004 - 19:58:44 CEST