Re: Noninferential vs. inferential DBMS
Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 09:30:31 +0300
Message-ID: <40a466bb_at_post.usenet.com>
- Post for FREE via your newsreader at post.usenet.com ****
"Paul" <paul_at_test.com> wrote in message
news:xcToc.4050$NK4.344338_at_stones.force9.net...
> x wrote:
> >>Is a non-inferential DBMS really a DBMS  ?
> >
> > Nobody has any opinon on the above ?
>
> Define "inferential" in the context of a database.
>
> A non-inferential database is one that you can add data to but you can't
> get ANYTHING  out? i.e. you can infer nothing from it? So you can INSERT,
> UPDATE or DELETE but not SELECT?
No. ANYTHING is too much. Of course you can get SOMETHING out.
 
in-fer-ence (in'fuhr uhns, -fruhns)  n.
                  3.  Logic.
                       a.  the process of deriving from assumed
                            premises either the strict logical
                            conclusion or one that is to some
                            degree probable.
                       b.  a proposition reached by a process
                            of inference.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
- Usenet.com - The #1 Usenet Newsgroup Service on The Planet! *** http://www.usenet.com Unlimited Download - 19 Seperate Servers - 90,000 groups - Uncensored -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
