Re: New RDBMS implementation
From: Anthony W. Youngman <wol_at_thewolery.demon.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 6 May 2004 23:41:19 +0100
Message-ID: <8RXoP0EP8rmAFw8f_at_thewolery.demon.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 6 May 2004 23:41:19 +0100
Message-ID: <8RXoP0EP8rmAFw8f_at_thewolery.demon.co.uk>
In message <pan.2004.05.06.16.06.37.397140_at_dutra.fastmail.fm>, Leandro
Guimarães Faria Corsetti Dutra <leandro_at_dutra.fastmail.fm> writes
>> Can you imagine a business relational database without real relvars and
>> views?
>
> I do think functions would do just OK. That said, there is no
>such thing as a pure functional language... all of them have side
>effects, and there lies their usefulness.
Forth?
Cheers,
Wol
-- Anthony W. Youngman - wol at thewolery dot demon dot co dot uk HEX wondered how much he should tell the Wizards. He felt it would not be a good idea to burden them with too much input. Hex always thought of his reports as Lies-to-People. The Science of Discworld : (c) Terry Pratchett 1999Received on Fri May 07 2004 - 00:41:19 CEST