Re: Len Silverston's Universal Data Models sanity
From: Leandro Guimarães Faria Corsetti Dutra <leandro_at_dutra.fastmail.fm>
Date: Wed, 05 May 2004 14:17:08 -0300
Message-ID: <pan.2004.05.05.17.17.06.84653_at_dutra.fastmail.fm>
>
> But there are many readers in the group who don't speak latin languages
> ;-)
>
> I agree, but I am more comfortable with Tutorial D.
Date: Wed, 05 May 2004 14:17:08 -0300
Message-ID: <pan.2004.05.05.17.17.06.84653_at_dutra.fastmail.fm>
Em Wed, 05 May 2004 14:31:30 +0000, Alfredo Novoa escreveu:
> Physical data independence is for that. The DBMS must ensure that the sum
Agreed, but with SQL physical data independence simply ain't
> of the movements matches with the stocks. If not, you would have
> uncontrolled redundancy. To control this redundancy has the same
> performance cost as to not have logical redundancy at all.
>> No need to translate, Brazilians can understand Spanish quite >>well... it would be nice to set somethink like a wiki for that.
>
> But there are many readers in the group who don't speak latin languages
> ;-)
OK, just let's not allow monoglots (AKA as anglophones) to hinder the progress of humankind.
>>Problem would become maintaining it, and settling on a preferred format. >>I would say Tutorial D would be quite nice for that, D4 good enough
>
> I agree, but I am more comfortable with Tutorial D.
Yes, at least it is published...
> BTW What do you think about to use Tutorial D or D4 instead of XML for
> data exchange?
The obvious thing.
Provided we have, say, universal data models...
-- Leandro Guimarães Faria Corsetti Dutra +55 (11) 5685 2219 Av Sgto Geraldo Santana, 1100 6/71 +55 (11) 5686 9607 04.674-000 São Paulo, SP BRASIL http://br.geocities.com./lgcdutra/Received on Wed May 05 2004 - 19:17:08 CEST
