Re: c.d.theory glossary - NULL

From: mAsterdam <mAsterdam_at_vrijdag.org>
Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2004 00:49:30 +0200
Message-ID: <408aef00$0$574$e4fe514c_at_news.xs4all.nl>


Senny wrote:
> I have a simple (and incomplete) definition. This post is less grandiose
> than my usual linguistic fare, but perhaps more helpful.

...and the focus is on helping to avoid real misunderstandings in this here newsgroup.

Yey! :-)

<borgface> We will assimilate this. </borgface>

Thank you. Received on Sun Apr 25 2004 - 00:49:30 CEST

Original text of this message