Re: A Bill of Materials Question

From: Laconic2 <laconic2_at_comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 15:16:28 -0400
Message-ID: <EoednXCJbchAEODdRVn-ug_at_comcast.com>

Glad you like it.

I think the BoM should list everything in the box, except for those things that are already listed by something in the box. <rim shot> Received on Wed Apr 14 2004 - 21:16:28 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Jan Hidders: "Re: The "standard" way to get to 3NF"
Previous message: Tom Hester: "Re: Date's First Great Blunder"
Maybe in reply to: Laconic2: "A Bill of Materials Question"
Next in thread: Eric Kaun: "Re: newby (very) question on XML DB theory"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message