Re: Testing Various Data Models?

Martha Stewart called it a Good Thing when "Dawn M. Wolthuis" <dwolt_at_tincat-group.com> wrote:
> "Mikito Harakiri" <mikharakiri_at_iahu.com> wrote in message
> news:1Po3c.19$X%.150_at_news.oracle.com...
>>
>> "Dawn M. Wolthuis" <dwolt_at_tincat-group.com> wrote in message
>> news:c2l3me$7qr$1_at_news.netins.net...
>> > P.S. Even if someone has a hunch with no backing whatsoever (which is
> not
>> > the case here), it is a good idea to find a way to test out such a
> hunch,
>> > right?
>>
>> For hunch-backed starting joining things might help.
>>
>
> The "hunch-backed" is clever, but what in the world does the rest of this
> mean? How would you propose testing out various data model theories for
> their usefulness in software applications? --dawn

_You're_ the one who was proposing the grand announcement.

Responsibility for having a strategy to evaluate the merits of alternatives therefore rests on you, not on anyone else.

-- 
(format nil "~S_at_~S" "cbbrowne" "acm.org")
http://www.ntlug.org/~cbbrowne/internet.html
If a cow laughed, would milk come out its nose?