Re: Interested in a moderated theory forum?

"Marshall Spight" <mspight_at_dnai.com> wrote in message news:iy0Pb.102663$I06.493901_at_attbi_s01... > "Bob Badour" <bbadour_at_golden.net> wrote in message news:EMadnaCfB6G_6pHdRVn-hA_at_golden.net...
> > "Marshall Spight" <mspight_at_dnai.com> wrote in message
> > news:zNHOb.82975$5V2.109454_at_attbi_s53...
> > > "Paul G. Brown" <paul_geoffrey_brown_at_yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > news:57da7b56.0401172227.1b7c03ea_at_posting.google.com...
> > > >
> > > > The problem with a moderated forum is that arseholes like Bob B.
> > > > would be banned very quickly. Now, Bobs's a complete prick, with
zero
> > > > redeeming social value. But he's often astute in his judgements and
> > > > (when he bothers to be) insightful in his advice.
> > >
> > > Let me see if I can generalize from your comments:
> > >
> > > If a person provides insightful advice and astute judgements when
> > > they bother to, then we ought to put up with whatever else they do,
> > > even if they act like a complete prick with zero redeeming social
value.
> > >
> > > Is that what you're trying to say? Because I really don't think
> > > it's a good idea.
> >
> > Tell me: What is the redeeming social value of the leeches who survive
by
> > pumping their victims full of anticoagulant horseshit?

>
> I would be happy to answer your question if I could figure out
> what it was you were asking.

Consider who I insult for the most part and what they are doing in the newsgroup at the time. Received on Tue Jan 20 2004 - 03:58:13 CET