Re: relations aren't types?
From: Marshall Spight <mspight_at_dnai.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 05:00:58 GMT
Message-ID: <eYKMb.40343$xy6.108798_at_attbi_s02>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 05:00:58 GMT
Message-ID: <eYKMb.40343$xy6.108798_at_attbi_s02>
"Adrian Kubala" <adrian_at_sixfingeredman.net> wrote in message news:slrnc066ek.vjp.adrian_at_sixfingeredman.net...
>
> Since the original question was ...
Well, I wasn't responding to the original question; I was responding to the context that I snipped. Your post, while interesting, doesn't seem to be a response to what I wrote. I was addressing one very narrow implementation concern. (Or "efficiency concern" if you like that better.)
Marshall Received on Tue Jan 13 2004 - 06:00:58 CET