Re: OOP - a question about database access
Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2003 07:01:57 GMT
Message-ID: <Flmqb.19888$2e5.13794_at_newssvr32.news.prodigy.com>
Bob Badour wrote:
> They declared a deadline at about a tenth or less of the time required and
> asked for the whole enchilada. They then beat up the developers for
failing
> to deliver, but urged them to do better for the next timebox... I found it
> abusive, wasteful and counterproductive.
Wow! I have certainly never seen /that/ behavior before!
> I have no problems with realistic deadlines or with managers who actually
> manage. Prioritizing features and making realistic assessments of what the
> team can deliver in the time available is simply management--as is
adjusting
> the target feature list as development progresses.
>
> If there is any risk at all of any of the "must have" features not making
it
> in before the deadline, a manager will resolve the issue before
development
> begins rather than wait for an irresistable force to meet an unmovable
> object.
One could also do the "must have" features first ;-)
--
Phlip
http://www.c2.com/cgi/wiki?TestFirstUserInterfaces
Received on Thu Nov 06 2003 - 08:01:57 CET
