Re: foundations of relational theory?

Okay, I understand, "Theoretically" the hypothetical brontosaurus is small on both ends and big in the middle.

Reminds me about something I heard about Ohio - it's round on both ends and high in the middle. 8>( Sorry

Larry Hazel

"Mark Brown" <mbrown_at_drexelmgt.com> wrote in message news:XmXob.86179$ZH4.45490_at_twister.socal.rr.com...
> Only factually. Theoretically it could still exist somewhere.
>
> "The odds of being eatten by a lion on Main Street are about a million to
> one. But once should be enough for anyone."
>
> Mark
>
> "Homer L. Hazel" <hNoOmerlhANTI_at_SPAMcox.net> wrote in message
> news:EUTob.50261$gi2.47163_at_fed1read01...
> > Sorry,
> >
> > Your theory does not match reality.
> >
> > The Brontosaurus is extinct! 8>)
> >
> > Larry Hazel
> >
> >
> > "SixFtWabbit" <dragoninbabylon_at_cox.net> wrote in message
> > news:dNSob.119979$La.59953_at_fed1read02...
> > > "This is my theory. It is a theory and it is mine.
> > > The Brontosaurus is thin on one end, much much thicker in the middle,
> and
> > > thin again on the other end."
> > > Anne Elk
> > >
> > > "Joe" <avoidingspam_at_hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > > news:bnuink$159kuh$1_at_ID-49604.news.uni-berlin.de...
> > > > "Bob Badour" <bbadour_at_golden.net> wrote in
> > > > news:bntqpg$odk$1_at_mantis.golden.net:
> > > >
> > > > > "Joe" <avoidingspam_at_hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > > > > news:bnsf67$14s3bj$1_at_ID-49604.news.uni-berlin.de...
> > > > >> bbadour_at_golden.net (Bob Badour) wrote in
> > > > >> news:cd3b3cf.0310300617.1e902652_at_posting.google.com:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> > cmurthi <xyzcmurthi_at_quest.with.a.w.net> wrote in message
> > > > >> > news:<3F9FEB3A.9090508_at_quest.with.a.w.net>...
> > > > >> >> Please, Jeffrey, don't bother to engage in a pissing context;
> > > > >> >> let BB stew in his own poisonous words. There are others with
> > > > >> >> whom we can debate reasonably.
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >> Oh, and someone capable of saying "A well-designed base
database
> > > > >> >> will require few or no complex constraints" is obviously
living
> > > > >> >> in an alternate universe and not worthy of serious
> > > > >> >> consideration.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > If you mean a universe with better data management products
than
> > > > >> > Pick, then yes, I live in a different universe than you. I live
> > > > >> > in the real one.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> That's good. A guy from comp.databases.theory claiming to live
in
> > > > >> the real world. Bob, to quote you, you're an idiot.
> > > > >
> > > > > Theory exists in the real world and exists to describe the real
> > > > > world. You are the idiot.
> > > >
> > > > I stand corrected - you're a funny idiot, Bob. <g>
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Joe
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
Received on Sun Nov 02 2003 - 18:07:06 CET