Re: Level of Abuse

From: Bill H <wphaskett_at_THISISMUNGEDatt.net>
Date: Sat, 01 Nov 2003 19:08:32 GMT
Message-ID: <QwTob.61476$ao4.164060_at_attbi_s51>


Chandru:

For the benefit of my "peace-of-mind", I simply added Mr. Badour and Mr. Mikhara to my "blocked" senders list. Now I don't have to read anything they write. :-)

This is an excellent solution. Remember, years ago apparatchiks like these used to trash all non-Microsoft technology as "idiotic" and those involved with that technology as "idiots". It seems much too stressful to address the content of their writings. :-)

It is so pleasingly egocentric to think that coarse and angry writings have something to offer, simply because the reader can identify a few scant pieces of clarity amongst all the vitriol. After awhile, as un-"politically correct" as it may be, they've been relegated to my "Blocked senders list". :-)

Bill

"cmurthi" <xyzcmurthi_at_quest.with.a.w.net> wrote in message news:3FA12AE5.8040507_at_quest.with.a.w.net...
> I have a question for you cdt-ers: is there any level of invective and
> abuse that you guys (and gals) will not tolerate? In other words, is
> there anyone there who can tell these cretins where to get off, at least
> for the good of your "community?" Or do totally cow you? It's a sad
> commentary on the nature of debate in the theoretical world.
>
> Oh by the way, Jeffrey, I can say "told ya so!".
>
> Chandru Murthi
Received on Sat Nov 01 2003 - 20:08:32 CET

Original text of this message